Talk:Bowman Class

Edit Page

How come this guide does not have its own edit page? :P --Rapta 05:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Biased Article >_>

This article is really biased... >_> ~Okazu

Necessary Changes Made

I have made necessary changes to the guides to remove saving from all builds, due to the skill reformatting of the new patch.

Suggestion to Help Slow Computers

Guys, consider removing the large picture of the bowman (or other parts of the article), for the topic is getting too large and may cause problems for the slow computers. --Champion911 16:29, 7 March 2006 (CST)

Level 30+ Distribution?

Hey, does anyone know when you are going to put level 30+ distribution?

• Heh. No. The MapleTip guide (on the main page of MT) doesn't have second job yet... Well. I don't think it does. Ryalla 18:38, 7 March 2006 (CST)

-I'd say your best bet is to use this guide then switch over to a custom for second job. --Oh.My.Goose. 08:27, 9 March 2006 (CST)

Article Divide?

This article is getting really large. Maybe it would be better off being divided with links to different sections. --- Rapta 19:40, 18 March 2006 (CST)

Yes, I agree, maybe it's time to split the guides up into the different job advancements. Each guide is getting to large to read at once. --Champion911 19:42, 18 March 2006 (CST)

Well, once I finish up with the skills category, we can just remove the unneeded skill sections from all the main guides. -- Rapta 20:48, 22 March 2006 (CST)

Builds Discussion

MULTI-BUILD = Messed up!! I followed it with my archer, but it tells you to make your Amazons Bless 18 by level 16, but the max level for Amazons Bless is 16! What do I do with my 2 leftover points? T_T EliteJeff 09:59, 28 March 2006 (CST) (Hopes his Crossbowman-to-be isn't ruined)

Lol, since that build isn't a very good one, I suggest you add the two points to eye of the amazon, for you only get 3 with this build. Don't know why you followed this one anyways... O.o --Champion911 17:45, 28 March 2006 (CST)

I followed it cause i had no experience with archers and it said it was a good build T_T Is it bad enough so that I should make a new archer? EliteJeff 17:50, 28 March 2006 (CST)

I don't even know why that build is there. NO offence, but it kind of sucks. You don't get to max critical shot, and you don't get to max eye of the amazon. Sorry it you have to start over, but theres not much that can be done. --Champion911 17:55, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Ok, then, ill start over. Which build should I use? EliteJeff 17:57, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Dunno, I just used an edited version of the one on the main website. Although I have noticed that guide is seriously corrupted. :P Anyways, I can get rid of the guides from this page today, since I'll be putting them all in here.---Rapta 18:18, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Oh, and also, we can remove the skills as well by the end of today. ---Rapta 18:19, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Alrighty, with recommendations from Champion ive decided to use the 'Arrow Blow + Focus' build from GrimTwilight. Sure, you can take those things out... (Make sure to not get Danelkayam angry, he gets mad when people edit his guides too much) ((His guides are the 'official' ones)) EliteJeff 18:22, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Eh, he can put them back in if he gets "angry", I just want to get the Skill guide and Skills categories finished. So even if he says that I can't edit, doesn't me that I can't extrapolate. :D --Rapta 18:29, 28 March 2006 (CST)

I prefer an edited Double Shot With Amazon's Bless build for crossbowmen, but if you want to go the Arrow Blow route, good luck. ^^; ~~ Ryalla 06:32, 29 March 2006 (CST)

The problem with that one is that it gets you no Focus. Oh, and I've kind of decided to do a slightly different version, so I get 1 Arrow Blow and 19 Double Shot, so i'm techically doing a Double Shot + Focus build. EliteJeff 08:52, 29 March 2006 (CST)

Re: Spelling/Grammar errors=

I noted the warning about the number of errors, and so I took some time to look over the article and improve the overall quality of it. Some areas needed a bit of a re-wording, though, so if someone could go look it over and see it'd be appreciated. You can revert it back if it's a bit much. --Dah-BAM! [Moofey] 15:28, 21 April 2006 (CDT)

Yep, that's why I tagged this article with that tag about grammar. :) --Rapta 17:15, 22 April 2006 (CDT)