Talk:Magician Edit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__TOC__ | |||
==Protection, Vandalism== | |||
Protecting the main ones and making a copy for editing to prevent vandalism was a bad move, i think. We had no problem before with vandalism, and when it happened, we fixed it in 2 seconds. All this does is hamper how quickly an important guide can be fixed. [[User:EliteJeff|EliteJeff]] 02:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC) | Protecting the main ones and making a copy for editing to prevent vandalism was a bad move, i think. We had no problem before with vandalism, and when it happened, we fixed it in 2 seconds. All this does is hamper how quickly an important guide can be fixed. [[User:EliteJeff|EliteJeff]] 02:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Anyways, I copied over some of the edits that I made on the previous revision of the guide before Danelkayam decided to revert and protect it. --[[User:Rapta|Rapta]] 05:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Editing Enabled!== | |||
Good idea making an identical guide for editing--[[User:Danelkayam|Danelkayam]] 08:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:08, 8 April 2006
Protection, Vandalism
Protecting the main ones and making a copy for editing to prevent vandalism was a bad move, i think. We had no problem before with vandalism, and when it happened, we fixed it in 2 seconds. All this does is hamper how quickly an important guide can be fixed. EliteJeff 02:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Anyways, I copied over some of the edits that I made on the previous revision of the guide before Danelkayam decided to revert and protect it. --Rapta 05:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Editing Enabled!
Good idea making an identical guide for editing--Danelkayam 08:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)